Cognism vs Collective[i]
Cognism vs Collective[i], compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cognism is on 65/100 and Collective[i] on 49/100.
![Collective[i] logo](https://cdn.startuphub.ai/storage/v1/object/public/entity-images/startups/990245.jpg){kind=small}
Where each one leads
Cognism
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 467 against 47
- funding raised: $113M against $20.0M
Collective[i]
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cognism | Collective[i] |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B sales intelligence platform providing compliant contact and company data for lead generation and prospecting. | AI-powered platform that helps B2B sales teams improve forecasting and performance. |
| Category | Sales Intelligence, B2B Data, Lead Generation, Prospecting | Sales Intelligence, Sales Enablement, B2B SaaS, Revenue Operations |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cognism | Collective[i] |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 467 | 47 |
| Total funding | $113M | $20.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $450M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 9,700 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cognism | Collective[i] |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cognism | Collective[i] |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
Cognism vs Collective[i]: common questions
Which is better, Cognism or Collective[i]?
On our 0-100 score Cognism rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cognism and Collective[i] compare on the numbers?
Cognism leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), domain rating (79/100 against 43/100), headcount (467 against 47), funding raised ($113M against $20.0M). Collective[i] leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100).
Read the full Cognism review and pricing or the Collective[i] review and pricing. You can also browse other Cognism alternatives we track.