Cognex vs Cybord
Cognex vs Cybord, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cognex is on 7/100 and Cybord on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Cognex
- domain rating: 74/100 against 30/100
Cybord
- our overall score: 55/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cognex | Cybord |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cognex Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets machine vision systems and sensors for factory automation. | AI-powered visual inspection for electronic component verification in SMT lines. |
| Category | Machine Vision, Industrial Automation, Factory Automation, Computer Vision | Visual Inspection, Electronics, Manufacturing, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 1981 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Natick, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cognex | Cybord |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 31 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +114.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $8.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,078 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cognex | Cybord |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cognex | Cybord |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cognex vs Cybord: common questions
Which is better, Cognex or Cybord?
On our 0-100 score Cybord rates higher (55/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cognex and Cybord compare on the numbers?
Cognex leads on domain rating (74/100 against 30/100). Cybord leads on our overall score (55/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Cognex review and pricing or the Cybord review and pricing. You can also browse other Cognex alternatives we track.