Cofense vs Webroot
Cofense vs Webroot, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofense is on 55/100 and Webroot on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Cofense
- our overall score: 55/100 against 50/100
Webroot
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 30/100
- funding raised: $109M against $58.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Cofense | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for phishing detection and response, turning employees into a human firewall. | Cloud-based cybersecurity solutions for individuals and businesses, leveraging AI and threat intelligence. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Email Security | Cybersecurity, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Leesburg, United States | Broomfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofense | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $58.0M | $109M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofense | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofense | Webroot |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Htmx, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cofense vs Webroot: common questions
Which is better, Cofense or Webroot?
On our 0-100 score Cofense rates higher (55/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofense and Webroot compare on the numbers?
Cofense leads on our overall score (55/100 against 50/100). Webroot leads on agent readiness (36/100 against 30/100), funding raised ($109M against $58.0M).
Read the full Cofense review and pricing or the Webroot review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofense alternatives we track.