Cofense vs Phish.ai
Cofense vs Phish.ai, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofense is on 55/100 and Phish.ai on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Cofense
- our overall score: 55/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 8/100
Phish.ai
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cofense | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for phishing detection and response, turning employees into a human firewall. | Real-time, zero-day phishing prevention using cloud-native AI and computer vision. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Email Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Leesburg, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofense | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2 |
| Total funding | $58.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofense | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofense | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| Frameworks | Htmx, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cofense | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Harnessing the power of Phish.AI, PhishTank, Google Big Query and Google Data Studio to analyze Phishing Trends.”r/bigquery
Cofense vs Phish.ai: common questions
Which is better, Cofense or Phish.ai?
On our 0-100 score Cofense rates higher (55/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofense and Phish.ai compare on the numbers?
Cofense leads on our overall score (55/100 against 19/100), domain rating (75/100 against 8/100). Phish.ai leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 30/100).
What do real users say about Cofense and Phish.ai?
Phish.ai: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bigquery.
Read the full Cofense review and pricing or the Phish.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofense alternatives we track.