Cofense vs Paubox
Cofense vs Paubox, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofense is on 55/100 and Paubox on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Cofense
- our overall score: 55/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $58.0M against $14.2M
Paubox
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cofense | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for phishing detection and response, turning employees into a human firewall. | HIPAA compliant email security and marketing solutions for organizations handling sensitive data. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Email Security | Cybersecurity, HIPAA Compliance, Email Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Leesburg, United States | Salt Lake City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofense | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 46 |
| Total funding | $58.0M | $14.2M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A2 |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 3,915 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofense | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofense | Paubox |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Htmx, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cofense vs Paubox: common questions
Which is better, Cofense or Paubox?
On our 0-100 score Cofense rates higher (55/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofense and Paubox compare on the numbers?
Cofense leads on our overall score (55/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($58.0M against $14.2M). Paubox leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Cofense review and pricing or the Paubox review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofense alternatives we track.