Cofense vs Herd Security
Cofense vs Herd Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofense is on 55/100 and Herd Security on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cofense
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $58.0M against $3.0M
Herd Security
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cofense | Herd Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for phishing detection and response, turning employees into a human firewall. | Agentic AI platform for security training. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Email Security | Cybersecurity, Agentic AI, AI Video Generation, EdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Leesburg, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofense | Herd Security |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $58.0M | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofense | Herd Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 18/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofense | Herd Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Htmx, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Cofense vs Herd Security: common questions
Which is better, Cofense or Herd Security?
On our 0-100 score Cofense rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofense and Herd Security compare on the numbers?
Cofense leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), domain rating (75/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($58.0M against $3.0M). Herd Security leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Cofense review and pricing or the Herd Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofense alternatives we track.