Cofense vs Cybaverse
Cofense vs Cybaverse, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cofense is on 55/100 and Cybaverse on 39/100.
Where each one leads
Cofense
- our overall score: 55/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $58.0M against $7.5M
Cybaverse
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cofense | Cybaverse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for phishing detection and response, turning employees into a human firewall. | AI-powered cybersecurity platform simplifying security for SMEs and MSPs. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Email Security | Cybersecurity, SaaS, AI-driven Security, Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Leesburg, United States | Portsmouth, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cofense | Cybaverse |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 47 |
| Total funding | $58.0M | $7.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,580 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cofense | Cybaverse |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cofense | Cybaverse |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Htmx, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Cofense vs Cybaverse: common questions
Which is better, Cofense or Cybaverse?
On our 0-100 score Cofense rates higher (55/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cofense and Cybaverse compare on the numbers?
Cofense leads on our overall score (55/100 against 39/100), domain rating (75/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($58.0M against $7.5M). Cybaverse leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 30/100).
Read the full Cofense review and pricing or the Cybaverse review and pricing. You can also browse other Cofense alternatives we track.