Coefficient Bio vs Hexagon
Coefficient Bio vs Hexagon, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coefficient Bio is on 70/100 and Hexagon on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Coefficient Bio
- our overall score: 70/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 4,836 against 67
- funding raised: $16B against $61.0M
Hexagon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. | Biotech company using genomics and AI to discover novel small-molecule medicines from microbial genomes. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Frontier AI Lab | AI, Biotech, Drug Discovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Menlo Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,836 | 67 |
| Total funding | $16B | $61.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $30B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,743,477 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 97/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 28/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
What users say
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Hexagon |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Anthropic buys biotech startup Coefficient Bio in $400M deal: Reports. Anthropic moving further into life sciences and bioinformatics”r/bioinformatics
Coefficient Bio vs Hexagon: common questions
Which is better, Coefficient Bio or Hexagon?
On our 0-100 score Coefficient Bio rates higher (70/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coefficient Bio and Hexagon compare on the numbers?
Coefficient Bio leads on our overall score (70/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), domain rating (92/100 against 28/100), headcount (4,836 against 67), funding raised ($16B against $61.0M).
What do real users say about Coefficient Bio and Hexagon?
Coefficient Bio: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bioinformatics.
Read the full Coefficient Bio review and pricing or the Hexagon review and pricing. You can also browse other Coefficient Bio alternatives we track.