Coefficient Bio vs Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Coefficient Bio vs Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Coefficient Bio is on 70/100 and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Coefficient Bio
- our overall score: 70/100 against 59/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 80/100
- headcount: 4,836 against 1,183
- funding raised: $16B against $9.3M
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI safety and research company building reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. | A leading organization dedicated to curing and treating cystic fibrosis. |
| Category | Biotechnology, Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare, Frontier AI Lab | Biotechnology, Healthcare, Non-profit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2G |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 1955 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Bethesda, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,836 | 1,183 |
| Total funding | $16B | $9.3M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $30B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,743,477 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 97/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Coefficient Bio | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Anthropic buys biotech startup Coefficient Bio in $400M deal: Reports. Anthropic moving further into life sciences and bioinformatics”r/bioinformatics
Coefficient Bio vs Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: common questions
Which is better, Coefficient Bio or Cystic Fibrosis Foundation?
On our 0-100 score Coefficient Bio rates higher (70/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Coefficient Bio and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation compare on the numbers?
Coefficient Bio leads on our overall score (70/100 against 59/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 25/100), domain rating (92/100 against 80/100), headcount (4,836 against 1,183), funding raised ($16B against $9.3M).
What do real users say about Coefficient Bio and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation?
Coefficient Bio: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bioinformatics.
Read the full Coefficient Bio review and pricing or the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation review and pricing. You can also browse other Coefficient Bio alternatives we track.