Qodo vs Tekkerz
Qodo vs Tekkerz, compared side by side on 8 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qodo is on 64/100 and Tekkerz on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Qodo
- our overall score: 64/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 31/100
Tekkerz
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Qodo | Tekkerz |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quality-first generative AI coding platform for writing, testing, and reviewing code. | Free for players and organisers. Organise matches, collect card payments, find opponents, post fixtures and track league standings — all in one app. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, Developer Tools, Generative AI, Foundation Model | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, MLOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qodo | Tekkerz |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 135 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +48.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,354 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qodo | Tekkerz |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 61/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qodo | Tekkerz |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Qodo | Tekkerz |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“qodo just raised $70M and their pitch is that test generation was never the hard part. Qodo raised $70M last week and the interesting part is beyond the money. it's that their entire pitch is positioned around verification instead of test g”r/agenticQAtesting
Qodo vs Tekkerz: common questions
Which is better, Qodo or Tekkerz?
On our 0-100 score Qodo rates higher (64/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 8 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qodo and Tekkerz compare on the numbers?
Qodo leads on our overall score (64/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 31/100).
What do real users say about Qodo and Tekkerz?
Qodo: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/agenticQAtesting.
Read the full Qodo review and pricing or the Tekkerz review and pricing. You can also browse other Qodo alternatives we track.