Qodo vs Cursor (Anysphere)

Qodo vs Cursor (Anysphere), compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qodo is on 64/100 and Cursor (Anysphere) on 68/100.

Qodo logo
QodoQuality-first generative AI coding platform for writing, testing, and reviewing code.
Try Qodo
Cursor (Anysphere) logo
Cursor (Anysphere)Cursor is an AI code editor built to make you extraordinarily productive by coding with AI.
Try Cursor (Anysphere)

Where each one leads

Qodo

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

Cursor (Anysphere)

  • our overall score: 68/100 against 64/100
  • domain rating: 90/100 against 75/100
  • funding raised: $4.8B against $1.5M
  • LinkedIn following: 43,638 against 12,354

At a glance

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
What it isQuality-first generative AI coding platform for writing, testing, and reviewing code.Cursor is an AI code editor built to make you extraordinarily productive by coding with AI.
CategoryAI Coding Assistant, Developer Tools, Generative AI, Foundation ModelArtificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Code Editor, AI Coding Assistant
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingPlatformSoftware
Founded20222022
HeadquartersTel Aviv, IsraelSan Francisco, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
Employees135125
Headcount growthLast 12 months+48.5%Not published
Total funding$1.5M$4.8B
Latest roundSeedSeries D
ValuationNot published$29B
LinkedIn followers12,35443,638

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating64/10068/100
Traction51/10060/100
Team70/10030/100
CommunityNot published8/100
Search visibility61/10071/100
Quality68/10078/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (48/100)D (47/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10075/10090/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
HostingNot detectedVercel
CDNCloudflareVercel
CMSWordPressGhost
FrameworksJqueryNext.js, Tailwind CSS
AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager, Linkedin InsightNot detected
Support stackZendeskNot detected
Open sourceYesYes

Product and pricing

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
Key featuresNot publishedAI-Powered Code Completion, Codebase Awareness, Natural Language Editing, Background Agents, Bug Bot Integration, Privacy Mode
Current offerNot published50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra

What users say

MeasureQodoCursor (Anysphere)
Reddit sentimentThreads we track2 positive, 1 negative across 6 threadsNot published
Qodo
qodo just raised $70M and their pitch is that test generation was never the hard part. Qodo raised $70M last week and the interesting part is beyond the money. it's that their entire pitch is positioned around verification instead of test g
r/agenticQAtesting

Qodo vs Cursor (Anysphere): common questions

Which is better, Qodo or Cursor (Anysphere)?

On our 0-100 score Cursor (Anysphere) rates higher (68/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Qodo and Cursor (Anysphere) compare on the numbers?

Cursor (Anysphere) leads on our overall score (68/100 against 64/100), domain rating (90/100 against 75/100), funding raised ($4.8B against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (43,638 against 12,354).

What do real users say about Qodo and Cursor (Anysphere)?

Qodo: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/agenticQAtesting.

Read the full Qodo review and pricing or the Cursor (Anysphere) review and pricing. You can also browse other Qodo alternatives we track.