CodeSandbox vs Cursor
CodeSandbox vs Cursor, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CodeSandbox is on 50/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
CodeSandbox
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $2.9B against $15.2M
At a glance
| Measure | CodeSandbox | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Instant cloud development environments for coding, collaboration, and AI agent execution. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure, API Platform, Agentic AI | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | Freemium | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CodeSandbox | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $15.2M | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CodeSandbox | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CodeSandbox | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | CodeSandbox | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
CodeSandbox vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, CodeSandbox or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CodeSandbox and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($2.9B against $15.2M).
Read the full CodeSandbox review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other CodeSandbox alternatives we track.