CodeRabbit vs Magic
CodeRabbit vs Magic, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CodeRabbit is on 55/100 and Magic on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CodeRabbit
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 210 against 37
- funding raised: $120M against $10.0M
Magic
- our overall score: 65/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | CodeRabbit | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven platform that revolutionizes code reviews for enhanced quality and faster software delivery. | AI-powered coding agents for automated software engineering tasks. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, Developer Tools, Code Review, Generative AI | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CodeRabbit | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 210 | 37 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | $120M | $10.0M |
| Valuation | $550 | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 32,641 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CodeRabbit | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CodeRabbit | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | No |
CodeRabbit vs Magic: common questions
Which is better, CodeRabbit or Magic?
On our 0-100 score Magic rates higher (65/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CodeRabbit and Magic compare on the numbers?
CodeRabbit leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100), domain rating (79/100 against 56/100), headcount (210 against 37), funding raised ($120M against $10.0M). Magic leads on our overall score (65/100 against 55/100).
Read the full CodeRabbit review and pricing or the Magic review and pricing. You can also browse other CodeRabbit alternatives we track.