CodeRabbit . vs Magic
CodeRabbit . vs Magic, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CodeRabbit . is on 63/100 and Magic on 65/100.
Where each one leads
CodeRabbit .
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 266 against 37
- funding raised: $143M against $10.0M
Magic
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CodeRabbit . | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CodeRabbit provides AI-powered code review and agentic change management to help developers understand, prioritize, and secure agent outputs. | AI-powered coding agents for automated software engineering tasks. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Code Review | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CodeRabbit . | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 266 | 37 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | $143M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 39,532 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CodeRabbit . | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (65/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CodeRabbit . | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
CodeRabbit . vs Magic: common questions
Which is better, CodeRabbit . or Magic?
On our 0-100 score Magic rates higher (65/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CodeRabbit . and Magic compare on the numbers?
CodeRabbit . leads on agent readiness (65/100 against 42/100), headcount (266 against 37), funding raised ($143M against $10.0M).
Read the full CodeRabbit . review and pricing or the Magic review and pricing. You can also browse other CodeRabbit . alternatives we track.