Codename Goose vs Steel.dev
Codename Goose vs Steel.dev, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Codename Goose is on 14/100 and Steel.dev on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Codename Goose
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Steel.dev
- our overall score: 58/100 against 14/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 1/100
At a glance
| Measure | Codename Goose | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source framework for on-machine AI agents developed by Block's Open Source Program Office. | Cloud-based browser API for AI agents, simplifying web automation with anti-bot protection and session persistence. |
| Category | Developer Tools, Open Source, Agentic AI, AI Agent | Developer Tools, API Platform, Workflow Automation, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Codename Goose | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Codename Goose | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 14/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 36/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 16/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Codename Goose | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Codename Goose | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
Codename Goose vs Steel.dev: common questions
Which is better, Codename Goose or Steel.dev?
On our 0-100 score Steel.dev rates higher (58/100 against 14/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Codename Goose and Steel.dev compare on the numbers?
Steel.dev leads on our overall score (58/100 against 14/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 22/100), domain rating (51/100 against 1/100).
Read the full Codename Goose review and pricing or the Steel.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Codename Goose alternatives we track.