Codeium vs Cursor
Codeium vs Cursor, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Codeium is on 70/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Codeium
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 70/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 81/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 110
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -30.9%
- funding raised: $2.9B against $397M
- LinkedIn following: 361,335 against 63,143
At a glance
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered code acceleration platform that enhances developer productivity and code quality. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Generation | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 110 | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $397M | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Series C | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.3B | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | 63,143 | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 80/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
What users say
| Measure | Codeium | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“My name’s Vladimir, I’ve been writing code for 15 years. I remember the days before IntelliSense, when “autocomplete” meant a printed O’Reilly book on your desk and a strong memory. Over the last decade and a half, I’ve moved from jQuery sp”r/UIUXDesignFrontier
Codeium vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Codeium or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 70/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Codeium and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 70/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 29/100), domain rating (90/100 against 81/100), headcount (1,081 against 110), headcount growth (+500.0% against -30.9%), funding raised ($2.9B against $397M), LinkedIn following (361,335 against 63,143).
What do real users say about Codeium and Cursor?
Codeium: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/UIUXDesignFrontier.
Read the full Codeium review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other Codeium alternatives we track.