Codecorps vs Steel.dev
Codecorps vs Steel.dev, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Codecorps is on 8/100 and Steel.dev on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Codecorps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Steel.dev
- our overall score: 58/100 against 8/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Codecorps | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform helping developers find, contribute to, and fund open-source software projects. | Cloud-based browser API for AI agents, simplifying web automation with anti-bot protection and session persistence. |
| Category | Developer Tools, Open Source, Crowdfunding, Workflow Automation | Developer Tools, API Platform, Workflow Automation, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Codecorps | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Codecorps | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 8/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 16/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Codecorps | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Codecorps | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Volunteer Coders from Bernie's campaign are revving up for the long haul. Inspired by Bernie's message, we want to democratize organizing and campaigning, replacing money with people with the help of tech. But first, we need the infrastruct”r/Political_Revolution
Codecorps vs Steel.dev: common questions
Which is better, Codecorps or Steel.dev?
On our 0-100 score Steel.dev rates higher (58/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Codecorps and Steel.dev compare on the numbers?
Steel.dev leads on our overall score (58/100 against 8/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 48/100).
What do real users say about Codecorps and Steel.dev?
Codecorps: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Political_Revolution.
Read the full Codecorps review and pricing or the Steel.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Codecorps alternatives we track.