Code Input vs Cursor
Code Input vs Cursor, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Code Input is on 43/100 and Cursor on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Code Input
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cursor
- our overall score: 77/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,081 against 1
- funding raised: $2.9B against $6.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Code Input | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web-native developer productivity suite for high-velocity software delivery teams. | An AI-native code editor that helps developers write, understand, and manage code more efficiently. |
| Category | Developer Tools, MLOps, API Platform, Code Review | Artificial Intelligence, Developer Tools, AI Coding Assistant, Code Editor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Code Input | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 1,081 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $6.5M | $2.9B |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $50B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 361,335 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Code Input | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 12/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 83/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 93/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Code Input | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Ghost | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Code Input | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | 50% off first month of Pro, Pro+, or Ultra |
Code Input vs Cursor: common questions
Which is better, Code Input or Cursor?
On our 0-100 score Cursor rates higher (77/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Code Input and Cursor compare on the numbers?
Cursor leads on our overall score (77/100 against 43/100), domain rating (90/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,081 against 1), funding raised ($2.9B against $6.5M).
Read the full Code Input review and pricing or the Cursor review and pricing. You can also browse other Code Input alternatives we track.