Cockroach Labs vs Eon
Cockroach Labs vs Eon, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cockroach Labs is on 66/100 and Eon on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Cockroach Labs
- domain rating: 78/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 722 against 186
- LinkedIn following: 123,428 against 170
Eon
- our overall score: 71/100 against 66/100
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $997M against $308M
At a glance
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native distributed SQL database for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and scalability. | Eon provides a cloud backup posture management platform that automates backups and transforms them into usable assets for AI and analytics. |
| Category | Enterprise, Infrastructure, Database Management, Enterprise Software | Enterprise, Cloud, Cloud Backup Posture Management (CBPM), Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 722 | 186 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +218.8% |
| Total funding | $308M | $997M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,428 | 170 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | C (62/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | Eon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Cockroach Labs vs Eon: common questions
Which is better, Cockroach Labs or Eon?
On our 0-100 score Eon rates higher (71/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cockroach Labs and Eon compare on the numbers?
Cockroach Labs leads on domain rating (78/100 against 62/100), headcount (722 against 186), LinkedIn following (123,428 against 170). Eon leads on our overall score (71/100 against 66/100), agent readiness (62/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($997M against $308M).
Read the full Cockroach Labs review and pricing or the Eon review and pricing. You can also browse other Cockroach Labs alternatives we track.