Cockroach Labs vs MongoDB
Cockroach Labs vs MongoDB, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cockroach Labs is on 66/100 and MongoDB on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Cockroach Labs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
MongoDB
- our overall score: 70/100 against 66/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 1,800 against 722
- funding raised: $1.5B against $308M
At a glance
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native distributed SQL database for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and scalability. | A specialized document-oriented database platform. |
| Category | Enterprise, Infrastructure, Database Management, Enterprise Software | Big Data, Cloud Computing, Software, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 722 | 1,800 |
| Total funding | $308M | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Series E | Post-IPO |
| Valuation | $2.0B | $24B |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,428 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 90/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | MongoDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Cockroach Labs vs MongoDB: common questions
Which is better, Cockroach Labs or MongoDB?
On our 0-100 score MongoDB rates higher (70/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cockroach Labs and MongoDB compare on the numbers?
MongoDB leads on our overall score (70/100 against 66/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 50/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), headcount (1,800 against 722), funding raised ($1.5B against $308M).
Read the full Cockroach Labs review and pricing or the MongoDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Cockroach Labs alternatives we track.