Cockroach Labs vs FalkorDB
Cockroach Labs vs FalkorDB, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cockroach Labs is on 66/100 and FalkorDB on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Cockroach Labs
- our overall score: 66/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 722 against 19
- funding raised: $308M against $3.0M
- LinkedIn following: 123,428 against 4,097
FalkorDB
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native distributed SQL database for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and scalability. | Queryable property graph database using sparse matrices and linear algebra for graph queries. |
| Category | Enterprise, Infrastructure, Database Management, Enterprise Software | Enterprise, Database, Generative AI, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 722 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +98.3% |
| Total funding | $308M | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 123,428 | 4,097 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cockroach Labs | FalkorDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Cockroach Labs vs FalkorDB: common questions
Which is better, Cockroach Labs or FalkorDB?
On our 0-100 score Cockroach Labs rates higher (66/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cockroach Labs and FalkorDB compare on the numbers?
Cockroach Labs leads on our overall score (66/100 against 54/100), domain rating (78/100 against 55/100), headcount (722 against 19), funding raised ($308M against $3.0M), LinkedIn following (123,428 against 4,097). FalkorDB leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 50/100).
Read the full Cockroach Labs review and pricing or the FalkorDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Cockroach Labs alternatives we track.