CoBe Labs vs Firefly Neuroscience
CoBe Labs vs Firefly Neuroscience, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CoBe Labs is on 31/100 and Firefly Neuroscience on 56/100.
Where each one leads
CoBe Labs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Firefly Neuroscience
- our overall score: 56/100 against 31/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 35/100 against 0/100
- headcount: 25 against 2
- headcount growth: -3.3% against -14.9%
- LinkedIn following: 8,237 against 191
At a glance
| Measure | CoBe Labs | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Conversational AI platform for detecting and managing adolescent emotional distress. | Firefly Neuroscience provides objective brain function assessments for mental illness using FDA-cleared Brain Network Analytics (BNA™) technology. |
| Category | Healthcare, Mental Health, Mental Health Tech, Conversational AI | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Brain EEG Injury |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CoBe Labs | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 25 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.9% | -3.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $45.4M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 191 | 8,237 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CoBe Labs | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 31/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CoBe Labs | Firefly Neuroscience |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
CoBe Labs vs Firefly Neuroscience: common questions
Which is better, CoBe Labs or Firefly Neuroscience?
On our 0-100 score Firefly Neuroscience rates higher (56/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CoBe Labs and Firefly Neuroscience compare on the numbers?
Firefly Neuroscience leads on our overall score (56/100 against 31/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 31/100), domain rating (35/100 against 0/100), headcount (25 against 2), headcount growth (-3.3% against -14.9%), LinkedIn following (8,237 against 191).
Read the full CoBe Labs review and pricing or the Firefly Neuroscience review and pricing. You can also browse other CoBe Labs alternatives we track.