Clyde Works vs Firecrawl
Clyde Works vs Firecrawl, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clyde Works is on 2/100 and Firecrawl on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Clyde Works
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Firecrawl
- our overall score: 65/100 against 2/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Clyde Works is a Glasgow-based software company that builds and operates its own SaaS products and provides software development services. | Firecrawl provides web scraping and crawling APIs for developers and AI agents to power applications with clean, LLM-ready data. |
| Category | Product Engineering, Web Applications, API Platform, Data Pipelines | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Web Scraping, Web Crawling |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Glasgow, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 49 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $29.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 61,399 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 2/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 72/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Scrape API, Crawl Capabilities, Web Search Integration, Authenticated Scraping, Media Parsing, Smart Wait & Actions |
| Current offer | Not published | 10% off for their first purchase |
What users say
| Measure | Clyde Works | Firecrawl |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads |
“What is the best scraper tool right now? Firecrawl is great, but I want to explore more options. I’ve been using Firecrawl lately (which is great), but I’m more curious what others are using right now for a scalable scraping like large site”r/LocalLLaMA
Clyde Works vs Firecrawl: common questions
Which is better, Clyde Works or Firecrawl?
On our 0-100 score Firecrawl rates higher (65/100 against 2/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clyde Works and Firecrawl compare on the numbers?
Firecrawl leads on our overall score (65/100 against 2/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 47/100).
What do real users say about Clyde Works and Firecrawl?
Firecrawl: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/LocalLLaMA.
Read the full Clyde Works review and pricing or the Firecrawl review and pricing. You can also browse other Clyde Works alternatives we track.