CloudQuery vs Lunar.dev
CloudQuery vs Lunar.dev, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudQuery is on 53/100 and Lunar.dev on 54/100.
Where each one leads
CloudQuery
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 45/100
- funding raised: $18.5M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,167 against 2,250
Lunar.dev
- headcount: 30 against 19
- headcount growth: +66.5% against +13.0%
At a glance
| Measure | CloudQuery | Lunar.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source data integration platform for security and infrastructure teams. | Monitors and remediates issues with third-party APIs, focusing on breaking changes, latency, and costs. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Infrastructure, Open Source | Enterprise, API, Cybersecurity, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudQuery | Lunar.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.0% | +66.5% |
| Total funding | $18.5M | $6.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,167 | 2,250 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Lunar.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (63/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Lunar.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
CloudQuery vs Lunar.dev: common questions
Which is better, CloudQuery or Lunar.dev?
On our 0-100 score Lunar.dev rates higher (54/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudQuery and Lunar.dev compare on the numbers?
CloudQuery leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 53/100), domain rating (62/100 against 45/100), funding raised ($18.5M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (6,167 against 2,250). Lunar.dev leads on headcount (30 against 19), headcount growth (+66.5% against +13.0%).
Read the full CloudQuery review and pricing or the Lunar.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudQuery alternatives we track.