CloudQuery vs Keep
CloudQuery vs Keep, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudQuery is on 53/100 and Keep on 45/100.
Where each one leads
CloudQuery
- our overall score: 53/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 19 against 4
- headcount growth: +13.0% against +9.9%
- funding raised: $18.5M against $2.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,167 against 2,621
Keep
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | CloudQuery | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source data integration platform for security and infrastructure teams. | Open-source alert management platform using AI to reduce noise and improve alert actionability for engineers. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Infrastructure, Open Source | Enterprise, Development, Open Source, DevTools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudQuery | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.0% | +9.9% |
| Total funding | $18.5M | $2.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,167 | 2,621 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (63/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Keep |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
CloudQuery vs Keep: common questions
Which is better, CloudQuery or Keep?
On our 0-100 score CloudQuery rates higher (53/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudQuery and Keep compare on the numbers?
CloudQuery leads on our overall score (53/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (63/100 against 37/100), headcount (19 against 4), headcount growth (+13.0% against +9.9%), funding raised ($18.5M against $2.5M), LinkedIn following (6,167 against 2,621).
Read the full CloudQuery review and pricing or the Keep review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudQuery alternatives we track.