CloudQuery vs Firefly
CloudQuery vs Firefly, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudQuery is on 53/100 and Firefly on 61/100.
Where each one leads
CloudQuery
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 56/100
Firefly
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 113 against 19
- headcount growth: +48.1% against +13.0%
- funding raised: $29.5M against $18.5M
- LinkedIn following: 11,852 against 6,167
At a glance
| Measure | CloudQuery | Firefly |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source data integration platform for security and infrastructure teams. | Cloud control plane for discovering, understanding, and managing cloud infrastructure. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Infrastructure, Open Source | Enterprise, Software Development, Text to Image, Cloud Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudQuery | Firefly |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 113 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.0% | +48.1% |
| Total funding | $18.5M | $29.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,167 | 11,852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Firefly |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (63/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Firefly |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight +2 more |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
CloudQuery vs Firefly: common questions
Which is better, CloudQuery or Firefly?
On our 0-100 score Firefly rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudQuery and Firefly compare on the numbers?
CloudQuery leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 56/100). Firefly leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), headcount (113 against 19), headcount growth (+48.1% against +13.0%), funding raised ($29.5M against $18.5M), LinkedIn following (11,852 against 6,167).
Read the full CloudQuery review and pricing or the Firefly review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudQuery alternatives we track.