CloudQuery vs Datadog
CloudQuery vs Datadog, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudQuery is on 53/100 and Datadog on 67/100.
Where each one leads
CloudQuery
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 43/100
Datadog
- our overall score: 67/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 4,200 against 19
- funding raised: $794M against $18.5M
At a glance
| Measure | CloudQuery | Datadog |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source data integration platform for security and infrastructure teams. | Cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Infrastructure, Open Source | DevOps, Cloud Computing, Monitoring, Enterprise |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Software | SaaS | Platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudQuery | Datadog |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 4,200 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $18.5M | $794M |
| Latest round | Series A | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $7.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,167 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Datadog |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (63/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudQuery | Datadog |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
CloudQuery vs Datadog: common questions
Which is better, CloudQuery or Datadog?
On our 0-100 score Datadog rates higher (67/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudQuery and Datadog compare on the numbers?
CloudQuery leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 43/100). Datadog leads on our overall score (67/100 against 53/100), domain rating (88/100 against 62/100), headcount (4,200 against 19), funding raised ($794M against $18.5M).
Read the full CloudQuery review and pricing or the Datadog review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudQuery alternatives we track.