CloudPay vs Fama
CloudPay vs Fama, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudPay is on 70/100 and Fama on 57/100.
Where each one leads
CloudPay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 1,462 against 79
- funding raised: $178M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 33,244 against 3,532
Fama
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | CloudPay | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global payroll and payments platform for modern businesses. | AI-powered platform for analyzing public online data for talent screening and risk mitigation. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Payroll, Global Payroll | Talent Screening, HR Tech, Risk Management, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudPay | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,462 | 79 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -26.2% |
| Total funding | $178M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,244 | 3,532 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudPay | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 54/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudPay | Fama |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot, Zendesk |
CloudPay vs Fama: common questions
Which is better, CloudPay or Fama?
On our 0-100 score CloudPay rates higher (70/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudPay and Fama compare on the numbers?
CloudPay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 57/100), headcount (1,462 against 79), funding raised ($178M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (33,244 against 3,532). Fama leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100).
Read the full CloudPay review and pricing or the Fama review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudPay alternatives we track.