Cloudinary vs Tunefork
Cloudinary vs Tunefork, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudinary is on 72/100 and Tunefork on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudinary
- our overall score: 72/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 452 against 2
- headcount growth: +2.1% against -12.9%
- funding raised: $110M against $2.4M
- LinkedIn following: 72,105 against 998
Tunefork
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudinary | Tunefork |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloudinary is a cloud-based media management platform that enables developers and marketers to upload, store, manage, transform, and deliver images and videos. | Personalized hearing solutions based on individual earprints and noise exposure. |
| Category | Media, Management, Video, Media Management | Media, Audio, Mobile, Personalized |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudinary | Tunefork |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 452 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.1% | -12.9% |
| Total funding | $110M | $2.4M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Seed |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 72,105 | 998 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudinary | Tunefork |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 72/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 13/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudinary | Tunefork |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Jetpack Stats | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Cloudinary | Tunefork |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Usually when I'm making a WordPress site for a class or for myself, I use my personal Cloudinary account with the Cloudinary plugin, but for a client site this doesn't sound like a good idea, since my account has other images for other webs”r/webdev
Cloudinary vs Tunefork: common questions
Which is better, Cloudinary or Tunefork?
On our 0-100 score Cloudinary rates higher (72/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudinary and Tunefork compare on the numbers?
Cloudinary leads on our overall score (72/100 against 45/100), domain rating (91/100 against 13/100), headcount (452 against 2), headcount growth (+2.1% against -12.9%), funding raised ($110M against $2.4M), LinkedIn following (72,105 against 998).
What do real users say about Cloudinary and Tunefork?
Cloudinary: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webdev.
Read the full Cloudinary review and pricing or the Tunefork review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudinary alternatives we track.