Cloudera vs Starburst
Cloudera vs Starburst, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudera is on 39/100 and Starburst on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudera
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $6.2B against $414M
- LinkedIn following: 297,282 against 50,638
Starburst
- our overall score: 67/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hybrid cloud data platform for enterprise analytics and AI. | Data platform for apps and AI, unifying distributed data for analytics and AI innovation. |
| Category | Hybrid Cloud, Data Management, Data Warehousing, Data Lakes | AI, AI Infrastructure, Analytics, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 537 |
| Total funding | $6.2B | $414M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 297,282 | 50,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I work for Cloudera for Hive/Sqoop/Oozie components. I work tech support and I'm an avid BASHER (#/bin/bash type) Should you be curious about playing with Hive, check out my GitHub https://github.com/jpoblete/Hive Note: I do this on my pers”r/hadoop
Cloudera vs Starburst: common questions
Which is better, Cloudera or Starburst?
On our 0-100 score Starburst rates higher (67/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudera and Starburst compare on the numbers?
Cloudera leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($6.2B against $414M), LinkedIn following (297,282 against 50,638). Starburst leads on our overall score (67/100 against 39/100).
What do real users say about Cloudera and Starburst?
Cloudera: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/hadoop.
Read the full Cloudera review and pricing or the Starburst review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudera alternatives we track.