Cloudera vs IBM
Cloudera vs IBM, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudera is on 39/100 and IBM on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudera
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $6.2B against $153M
IBM
- our overall score: 61/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 81/100
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudera | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hybrid cloud data platform for enterprise analytics and AI. | Global technology leader providing AI, cloud, software, and consulting services for businesses. |
| Category | Hybrid Cloud, Data Management, Data Warehousing, Data Lakes | Software, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 1911 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | Armonk, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudera | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 324,517 |
| Total funding | $6.2B | $153M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Follow-on |
| LinkedIn followers | 297,282 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudera | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudera | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Segment | Microsoft Clarity |
What users say
| Measure | Cloudera | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“I work for Cloudera for Hive/Sqoop/Oozie components. I work tech support and I'm an avid BASHER (#/bin/bash type) Should you be curious about playing with Hive, check out my GitHub https://github.com/jpoblete/Hive Note: I do this on my pers”r/hadoop
Cloudera vs IBM: common questions
Which is better, Cloudera or IBM?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (61/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudera and IBM compare on the numbers?
Cloudera leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($6.2B against $153M). IBM leads on our overall score (61/100 against 39/100), domain rating (92/100 against 81/100).
What do real users say about Cloudera and IBM?
Cloudera: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/hadoop.
Read the full Cloudera review and pricing or the IBM review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudera alternatives we track.