Cloudera vs Starburst
Cloudera vs Starburst, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudera is on 61/100 and Starburst on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudera
- headcount: 3,435 against 537
- LinkedIn following: 295,734 against 50,638
Starburst
- our overall score: 67/100 against 61/100
- funding raised: $414M against $160M
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An enterprise data cloud platform for managing and analyzing data across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. | Data platform for apps and AI, unifying distributed data for analytics and AI innovation. |
| Category | Data Management, Big Data Analytics, Enterprise Software, Cloud Platforms (PaaS) | AI, AI Infrastructure, Analytics, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,435 | 537 |
| Total funding | $160M | $414M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series D |
| Valuation | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 295,734 | 50,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudera | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Cloudera vs Starburst: common questions
Which is better, Cloudera or Starburst?
On our 0-100 score Starburst rates higher (67/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudera and Starburst compare on the numbers?
Cloudera leads on headcount (3,435 against 537), LinkedIn following (295,734 against 50,638). Starburst leads on our overall score (67/100 against 61/100), funding raised ($414M against $160M).
Read the full Cloudera review and pricing or the Starburst review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudera alternatives we track.