Cloudera vs Confluent
Cloudera vs Confluent, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudera is on 61/100 and Confluent on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudera
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Confluent
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 4,700 against 3,435
- funding raised: $1.4B against $160M
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudera | Confluent |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An enterprise data cloud platform for managing and analyzing data across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. | Data streaming platform enabling real-time data processing and event-driven architectures. |
| Category | Data Management, Big Data Analytics, Enterprise Software, Cloud Platforms (PaaS) | Big Data, Data Infrastructure, Streaming, Event Processing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Platform | SaaS |
| Founded | 2008 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudera | Confluent |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,435 | 4,700 |
| Total funding | $160M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Series F | IPO |
| Valuation | $3.7B | $9.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 295,734 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudera | Confluent |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 81/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudera | Confluent |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Segment | Segment |
Cloudera vs Confluent: common questions
Which is better, Cloudera or Confluent?
On our 0-100 score Confluent rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudera and Confluent compare on the numbers?
Confluent leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), headcount (4,700 against 3,435), funding raised ($1.4B against $160M).
Read the full Cloudera review and pricing or the Confluent review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudera alternatives we track.