CloudEndure vs Tiger Technology
CloudEndure vs Tiger Technology, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudEndure is on 56/100 and Tiger Technology on 51/100.
Where each one leads
CloudEndure
- our overall score: 56/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $25.2M against $10.0M
Tiger Technology
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | CloudEndure | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CloudEndure provides disaster recovery, continuous backup, and live migration solutions for hybrid cloud environments. | On-premises-first hybrid cloud file data services for mission-critical workflows, enabling organizations to unlock the full value of unstructured enterprise data. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Disaster Recovery, Cloud Migration | Data Storage, Cloud Computing, Hybrid Cloud, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Sofia, Bulgaria |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudEndure | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -38.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $25.2M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,696 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudEndure | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudEndure | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | CloudEndure | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Curious if cloudendure users are still seeing issues with replication after the outage from today. Getting into the console is 50/50 and replication status once inside is a mess.”r/aws
CloudEndure vs Tiger Technology: common questions
Which is better, CloudEndure or Tiger Technology?
On our 0-100 score CloudEndure rates higher (56/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudEndure and Tiger Technology compare on the numbers?
CloudEndure leads on our overall score (56/100 against 51/100), domain rating (59/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($25.2M against $10.0M). Tiger Technology leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100).
What do real users say about CloudEndure and Tiger Technology?
CloudEndure: 0 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/aws.
Read the full CloudEndure review and pricing or the Tiger Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudEndure alternatives we track.