CloudEndure vs Exabeam
CloudEndure vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudEndure is on 56/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
CloudEndure
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 794 against 3
- headcount growth: +2.8% against -38.3%
- funding raised: $390M against $25.2M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 9,696
At a glance
| Measure | CloudEndure | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | CloudEndure provides disaster recovery, continuous backup, and live migration solutions for hybrid cloud environments. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Disaster Recovery, Cloud Migration | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudEndure | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -38.3% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $25.2M | $390M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,696 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudEndure | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudEndure | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | CloudEndure | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Curious if cloudendure users are still seeing issues with replication after the outage from today. Getting into the console is 50/50 and replication status once inside is a mess.”r/aws
CloudEndure vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, CloudEndure or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudEndure and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 22/100), domain rating (76/100 against 59/100), headcount (794 against 3), headcount growth (+2.8% against -38.3%), funding raised ($390M against $25.2M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 9,696).
What do real users say about CloudEndure and Exabeam?
CloudEndure: 0 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/aws.
Read the full CloudEndure review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudEndure alternatives we track.