CloudEats vs Hangry
CloudEats vs Hangry, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CloudEats is on 45/100 and Hangry on 51/100.
Where each one leads
CloudEats
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 26/100
Hangry
- our overall score: 51/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 29/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $73.5M against $31.4M
At a glance
| Measure | CloudEats | Hangry |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Operates cloud kitchens and in-house restaurant brands. | A virtual restaurant company operating multiple food brands from centralized cloud kitchens in Indonesia. |
| Category | Not published | FoodTech, Delivery, Virtual Restaurants, Cloud Kitchens |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Taguig, Philippines | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CloudEats | Hangry |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $31.4M | $73.5M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A5 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CloudEats | Hangry |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 16/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CloudEats | Hangry |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, React |
| Analytics | Not detected | Facebook Pixel |
CloudEats vs Hangry: common questions
Which is better, CloudEats or Hangry?
On our 0-100 score Hangry rates higher (51/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CloudEats and Hangry compare on the numbers?
CloudEats leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 26/100). Hangry leads on our overall score (51/100 against 45/100), domain rating (29/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($73.5M against $31.4M).
Read the full CloudEats review and pricing or the Hangry review and pricing. You can also browse other CloudEats alternatives we track.