Cloudberry Ventures vs Wind Capital
Cloudberry Ventures vs Wind Capital, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudberry Ventures is on 45/100 and Wind Capital on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudberry Ventures
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 21/100
Wind Capital
- our overall score: 49/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 24/100 against 15/100
- funding raised: $57.2M against $32.4M
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Wind Capital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on DeepTech advancements in Europe. | Paris-based VC investing in early-stage European deeptech startups focused on climate innovation. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Deep Tech, Artificial Intelligence, Industrial Infrastructure | Venture Capital, Deep Tech, Climate Innovation, Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2024 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Wind Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $32.4M | $57.2M |
| Latest round | Seed | Fund II |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Wind Capital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 15/100 | 24/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Wind Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cloudberry Ventures vs Wind Capital: common questions
Which is better, Cloudberry Ventures or Wind Capital?
On our 0-100 score Wind Capital rates higher (49/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudberry Ventures and Wind Capital compare on the numbers?
Cloudberry Ventures leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 21/100). Wind Capital leads on our overall score (49/100 against 45/100), domain rating (24/100 against 15/100), funding raised ($57.2M against $32.4M).
Read the full Cloudberry Ventures review and pricing or the Wind Capital review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudberry Ventures alternatives we track.