Cloudberry Ventures vs Seedcamp
Cloudberry Ventures vs Seedcamp, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloudberry Ventures is on 45/100 and Seedcamp on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Cloudberry Ventures
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Seedcamp
- our overall score: 66/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 15/100
- funding raised: $220M against $32.4M
At a glance
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Venture capital firm focused on DeepTech advancements in Europe. | Europe's first and most active pre-seed and seed fund. |
| Category | Venture Capital, Deep Tech, Artificial Intelligence, Industrial Infrastructure | Venture Capital, Fintech, Deep Tech, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 25 |
| Total funding | $32.4M | $220M |
| Latest round | Seed | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 62,686 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 15/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloudberry Ventures | Seedcamp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Cloudberry Ventures vs Seedcamp: common questions
Which is better, Cloudberry Ventures or Seedcamp?
On our 0-100 score Seedcamp rates higher (66/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloudberry Ventures and Seedcamp compare on the numbers?
Seedcamp leads on our overall score (66/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 37/100), domain rating (69/100 against 15/100), funding raised ($220M against $32.4M).
Read the full Cloudberry Ventures review and pricing or the Seedcamp review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloudberry Ventures alternatives we track.