Clockwise vs Reclaim.ai
Clockwise vs Reclaim.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clockwise is on 57/100 and Reclaim.ai on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Clockwise
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 43/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 7,463 against 5,355
Reclaim.ai
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
At a glance
| Measure | Clockwise | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered calendar assistant that optimizes schedules for individuals and teams, creating more time for focused work. | Intelligent scheduling tool that automatically protects time for priorities. |
| Category | Productivity Software, AI Tools & Apps, Workflow Automation, Calendar Management | Productivity Software, Calendar Automation, Time Management, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clockwise | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26 | 23 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,463 | 5,355 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clockwise | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clockwise | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Clockwise | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Scheduling, Flexible Meetings, Focus Time Protection, Scheduling Links, Team Optimization, Task Conversion | Not published |
Clockwise vs Reclaim.ai: common questions
Which is better, Clockwise or Reclaim.ai?
On our 0-100 score Reclaim.ai rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clockwise and Reclaim.ai compare on the numbers?
Clockwise leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 43/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (7,463 against 5,355). Reclaim.ai leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100).
Read the full Clockwise review and pricing or the Reclaim.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Clockwise alternatives we track.