Clockwise vs Laurel
Clockwise vs Laurel, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clockwise is on 57/100 and Laurel on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Clockwise
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 55/100
Laurel
- headcount: 285 against 26
- funding raised: $100M against $40.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Clockwise | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered calendar assistant that optimizes schedules for individuals and teams, creating more time for focused work. | AI-powered work intelligence platform for operational and profitability insights from time data. |
| Category | Productivity Software, AI Tools & Apps, Workflow Automation, Calendar Management | EdTech, AI-Powered Learning, Professional Development, Personalized Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clockwise | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26 | 285 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,463 | 8,772 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clockwise | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clockwise | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Clockwise | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Scheduling, Flexible Meetings, Focus Time Protection, Scheduling Links, Team Optimization, Task Conversion | Not published |
Clockwise vs Laurel: common questions
Which is better, Clockwise or Laurel?
On our 0-100 score Clockwise rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clockwise and Laurel compare on the numbers?
Clockwise leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 52/100), domain rating (76/100 against 55/100). Laurel leads on headcount (285 against 26), funding raised ($100M against $40.0M).
Read the full Clockwise review and pricing or the Laurel review and pricing. You can also browse other Clockwise alternatives we track.