Cloaked vs WideField Security
Cloaked vs WideField Security, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloaked is on 60/100 and WideField Security on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Cloaked
- our overall score: 60/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $404M against $14.3M
WideField Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cloaked | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A consumer-focused privacy company offering a bundle of security and privacy solutions, expanding into the enterprise market. | Extends identity security platform to cover autonomous AI agents. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Privacy, Identity Management, Consumer App | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Identity Management, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Sunnyvale, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloaked | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70 | Not published |
| Open roles | 11 | Not published |
| Total funding | $404M | $14.3M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloaked | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloaked | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
Cloaked vs WideField Security: common questions
Which is better, Cloaked or WideField Security?
On our 0-100 score Cloaked rates higher (60/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloaked and WideField Security compare on the numbers?
Cloaked leads on our overall score (60/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 35/100), domain rating (62/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($404M against $14.3M).
Read the full Cloaked review and pricing or the WideField Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloaked alternatives we track.