Cloaked vs LinOTP
Cloaked vs LinOTP, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cloaked is on 60/100 and LinOTP on 2/100.
Where each one leads
Cloaked
- our overall score: 60/100 against 2/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 40/100
LinOTP
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Cloaked | LinOTP |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A consumer-focused privacy company offering a bundle of security and privacy solutions, expanding into the enterprise market. | Open-source platform for strong multi-factor authentication and identity management. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Privacy, Identity Management, Consumer App | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Identity Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Weiterstadt, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cloaked | LinOTP |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70 | Not published |
| Open roles | 11 | Not published |
| Total funding | $404M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cloaked | LinOTP |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 2/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 7/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cloaked | LinOTP |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cloaked vs LinOTP: common questions
Which is better, Cloaked or LinOTP?
On our 0-100 score Cloaked rates higher (60/100 against 2/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cloaked and LinOTP compare on the numbers?
Cloaked leads on our overall score (60/100 against 2/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 27/100), domain rating (62/100 against 40/100).
Read the full Cloaked review and pricing or the LinOTP review and pricing. You can also browse other Cloaked alternatives we track.