Clipboard Health vs Workkit.io
Clipboard Health vs Workkit.io, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clipboard Health is on 69/100 and Workkit.io on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Clipboard Health
- our overall score: 69/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 3,596 against 3
- LinkedIn following: 79,245 against 19
Workkit.io
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Clipboard Health | Workkit.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Marketplace connecting healthcare facilities with per diem nurses and allied health professionals for flexible shifts. | A modern, digital staffing platform for fast, on-demand hiring using video and personalized profiles. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare Staffing, Marketplace, Nursing | HR, Recruitment, Video, Enterprise |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Marketplace | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clipboard Health | Workkit.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,596 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $80.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 79,245 | 19 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clipboard Health | Workkit.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 69/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clipboard Health | Workkit.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Branch | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes, 64 GitHub stars | No |
Clipboard Health vs Workkit.io: common questions
Which is better, Clipboard Health or Workkit.io?
On our 0-100 score Clipboard Health rates higher (69/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clipboard Health and Workkit.io compare on the numbers?
Clipboard Health leads on our overall score (69/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 27/100), domain rating (54/100 against 1/100), headcount (3,596 against 3), LinkedIn following (79,245 against 19).
Read the full Clipboard Health review and pricing or the Workkit.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Clipboard Health alternatives we track.