Clipboard Health vs TrueBlue
Clipboard Health vs TrueBlue, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Clipboard Health is on 69/100 and TrueBlue on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Clipboard Health
- our overall score: 69/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 48/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +7.7%
TrueBlue
- headcount: 12,438 against 3,596
- funding raised: $300M against $80.0M
- LinkedIn following: 150,151 against 79,245
At a glance
| Measure | Clipboard Health | TrueBlue |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Marketplace connecting healthcare facilities with per diem nurses and allied health professionals for flexible shifts. | Talent solutions provider for businesses, offering staffing, recruitment, and workforce solutions. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare Staffing, Marketplace, Nursing | Staffing, Recruitment, Workforce Solutions, Human Resources |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Marketplace | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tacoma, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Clipboard Health | TrueBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,596 | 12,438 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +7.7% |
| Total funding | $80.0M | $300M |
| Latest round | Series B | Conventional Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 79,245 | 150,151 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Clipboard Health | TrueBlue |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 69/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Clipboard Health | TrueBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Branch | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes, 64 GitHub stars | No |
Clipboard Health vs TrueBlue: common questions
Which is better, Clipboard Health or TrueBlue?
On our 0-100 score Clipboard Health rates higher (69/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Clipboard Health and TrueBlue compare on the numbers?
Clipboard Health leads on our overall score (69/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 36/100), domain rating (54/100 against 48/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +7.7%). TrueBlue leads on headcount (12,438 against 3,596), funding raised ($300M against $80.0M), LinkedIn following (150,151 against 79,245).
Read the full Clipboard Health review and pricing or the TrueBlue review and pricing. You can also browse other Clipboard Health alternatives we track.