ClimateView vs Silurian
ClimateView vs Silurian, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ClimateView is on 40/100 and Silurian on 54/100.
Where each one leads
ClimateView
- domain rating: 59/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 49 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 13,654 against 2,842
Silurian
- our overall score: 54/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | ClimateView | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ClimateView provides a platform for cities to manage and reduce their carbon emissions. | Foundation models for simulating Earth's systems, starting with weather. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Sustainability, Urban Planning, Data Platform | Foundation Model, AI-driven Weather Forecasting, Earth System Simulation, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Kirkland, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ClimateView | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 13 |
| Total funding | Not published | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,654 | 2,842 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ClimateView | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ClimateView | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Discourse | Not detected |
ClimateView vs Silurian: common questions
Which is better, ClimateView or Silurian?
On our 0-100 score Silurian rates higher (54/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ClimateView and Silurian compare on the numbers?
ClimateView leads on domain rating (59/100 against 25/100), headcount (49 against 13), LinkedIn following (13,654 against 2,842). Silurian leads on our overall score (54/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 44/100).
Read the full ClimateView review and pricing or the Silurian review and pricing. You can also browse other ClimateView alternatives we track.