ClimateCrop vs Tropic
ClimateCrop vs Tropic, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ClimateCrop is on 52/100 and Tropic on 62/100.
Where each one leads
ClimateCrop
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Tropic
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 41/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 158 against 5
- headcount growth: +2.1% against -18.4%
- funding raised: $166M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 13,020 against 3,635
At a glance
| Measure | ClimateCrop | Tropic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ClimateCrop uses gene discovery to enhance plant starch storage for increased yield and resilience. | Developing climate-resilient crop varieties using gene editing for sustainable agriculture. |
| Category | Biotech, Climate, Agritech, AgTech | Genetics, Crop, Agritech, CRISPR |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ClimateCrop | Tropic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 158 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.4% | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $166M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,635 | 13,020 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ClimateCrop | Tropic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ClimateCrop | Tropic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
ClimateCrop vs Tropic: common questions
Which is better, ClimateCrop or Tropic?
On our 0-100 score Tropic rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ClimateCrop and Tropic compare on the numbers?
Tropic leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), domain rating (41/100 against 13/100), headcount (158 against 5), headcount growth (+2.1% against -18.4%), funding raised ($166M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (13,020 against 3,635).
Read the full ClimateCrop review and pricing or the Tropic review and pricing. You can also browse other ClimateCrop alternatives we track.