ClimateCrop vs InSoil
ClimateCrop vs InSoil, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ClimateCrop is on 52/100 and InSoil on 51/100.
Where each one leads
ClimateCrop
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
InSoil
- domain rating: 33/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 47 against 5
- funding raised: $120M against $1.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,672 against 3,635
At a glance
| Measure | ClimateCrop | InSoil |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ClimateCrop uses gene discovery to enhance plant starch storage for increased yield and resilience. | Climate finance company providing debt capital to agricultural SMEs adopting sustainable farming practices. |
| Category | Biotech, Climate, Agritech, AgTech | Climate Finance, Sustainable Agriculture, Regenerative Agriculture, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Vilnius, Lithuania |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ClimateCrop | InSoil |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 47 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $120M |
| Latest round | Seed | credit facility |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,635 | 6,672 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ClimateCrop | InSoil |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ClimateCrop | InSoil |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
ClimateCrop vs InSoil: common questions
Which is better, ClimateCrop or InSoil?
On our 0-100 score ClimateCrop rates higher (52/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ClimateCrop and InSoil compare on the numbers?
InSoil leads on domain rating (33/100 against 13/100), headcount (47 against 5), funding raised ($120M against $1.0M), LinkedIn following (6,672 against 3,635).
Read the full ClimateCrop review and pricing or the InSoil review and pricing. You can also browse other ClimateCrop alternatives we track.