Climate X vs Xpansiv
Climate X vs Xpansiv, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Climate X is on 54/100 and Xpansiv on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Climate X
- LinkedIn following: 22,632 against 16,059
Xpansiv
- our overall score: 57/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 250 against 106
At a glance
| Measure | Climate X | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Climate risk analytics platform for physical assets and financial institutions. | Global commodity data and analytics platform for ESG and energy markets. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Risk Management, Financial Services, Data Analytics | Climate Tech, Energy, Commodity Data, ESG |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Climate X | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 106 | 250 |
| Total funding | Not published | $100M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,632 | 16,059 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Climate X | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Climate X | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Climate X vs Xpansiv: common questions
Which is better, Climate X or Xpansiv?
On our 0-100 score Xpansiv rates higher (57/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Climate X and Xpansiv compare on the numbers?
Climate X leads on LinkedIn following (22,632 against 16,059). Xpansiv leads on our overall score (57/100 against 54/100), domain rating (68/100 against 51/100), headcount (250 against 106).
Read the full Climate X review and pricing or the Xpansiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Climate X alternatives we track.