Climate X vs Stormfisher
Climate X vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Climate X is on 54/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Climate X
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 106 against 53
- LinkedIn following: 22,632 against 9,514
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 54/100
At a glance
| Measure | Climate X | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Climate risk analytics platform for physical assets and financial institutions. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Risk Management, Financial Services, Data Analytics | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Climate X | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 106 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $430M |
| Latest round | Not published | PE Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,632 | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Climate X | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 78/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Climate X | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Climate X vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Climate X or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Climate X and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Climate X leads on agent readiness (43/100 against 33/100), domain rating (51/100 against 34/100), headcount (106 against 53), LinkedIn following (22,632 against 9,514). Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 54/100).
Read the full Climate X review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Climate X alternatives we track.