Climate Analytics vs Stormfisher
Climate Analytics vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Climate Analytics is on 10/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Climate Analytics
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 33/100
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 10/100
At a glance
| Measure | Climate Analytics | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI platform for granular climate risk assessment. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Risk Management, AI-Driven Grid Balancing, Sustainability | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2023 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Climate Analytics | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $430M |
| Latest round | Not published | PE Round |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Climate Analytics | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Climate Analytics | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Linode | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Climate Analytics vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Climate Analytics or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Climate Analytics and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Climate Analytics leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 33/100). Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 10/100).
Read the full Climate Analytics review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Climate Analytics alternatives we track.